Dmitrijs Orlovs, Artis Rušiņš, Valters Skrastiņš, Janis Judvaitis. LPWAN Technologies for IoT: Real-World Deployment Performance and Practical Comparison. IoT (ISSN 2624-831X) , MDPI, 2025.
Bibtex citāts:
Bibtex citāts:
@article{19845_2025,
author = {Dmitrijs Orlovs and Artis Rušiņš and Valters Skrastiņš and Janis Judvaitis},
title = {LPWAN Technologies for IoT: Real-World Deployment Performance and Practical Comparison},
journal = {IoT (ISSN 2624-831X) },
publisher = {MDPI},
year = {2025}
}
author = {Dmitrijs Orlovs and Artis Rušiņš and Valters Skrastiņš and Janis Judvaitis},
title = {LPWAN Technologies for IoT: Real-World Deployment Performance and Practical Comparison},
journal = {IoT (ISSN 2624-831X) },
publisher = {MDPI},
year = {2025}
}
Anotācija: Low Power Wide Area Networks (LPWAN) have emerged as essential connectivity solutions for the Internet of Things (IoT), addressing requirements for long range, energy efficient communication that traditional wireless technologies cannot meet. With LPWAN connections projected to grow at 26\% compound annual growth rate until 2027, understanding real-world performance is crucial for technology selection. This review examines four leading LPWAN technologies --- LoRaWAN, Sigfox, NB-IoT, and LTE-M. This review analyzes 20 peer reviewed studies from 2015--2025 reporting real-world deployment metrics across power consumption, range, data rate, scalability, availability, and security. Field studies reveal significant discrepancies between theoretical specifications and practical performance. LoRaWAN achieves 2+ year battery life and 11 km rural range but suffers collision limitations above 1000 devices per gateway. Sigfox demonstrates exceptional range (280 km record) with minimal power consumption but remains constrained by 12 byte payloads and security vulnerabilities. NB-IoT provides robust performance with 96--100\% packet delivery ratios at -127 dBm and supports tens of thousands devices per cell, though mobility increases energy consumption. LTE-M offers highest throughput and sub 200 ms latency but fails beyond -113 dBm where NB-IoT maintains connectivity. NB-IoT emerges optimal for large scale stationary deployments, while LTE-M suits high throughput mobile applications.